
15. Telecommunications regulation |
 |
| |
Three basic ingredients appear
in most reform programmes
– private sector participation, market competition and
thecreation of an independent regulator. The interpretation and
sequencing of these ingredients within the overall mix of policies
is what distinguishes one approach from another, and may be as
important to successful reform as the individual ingredients
themselves.1
The
new ICT environment – privatised, competitive, responsive
to fast paced technological change and convergence
– shapes regulatory requirements. Three broad groups of
converging activities are subject to regulation within the sector:
telecommunications, broadcasting and the internet. Regulation
of these sectors is increasingly concentrated in the hands of
a single agency. Market mechanisms now play a greater role in
setting prices that were regulated in a monopolistic environment,
although often still under government influence. Interconnection
between operators and the licensing of new entrants into the
market have brought new regulatory responsibilities.
There is general agreement on the reasons for regulation. It
promotes universal service through licensing conditions and efficient
interconnection. It fosters competition to supply good quality,
diversified products at acceptable prices. It limits anti-competitive
behaviour and fosters a favourable investment climate. It optimises
scarce resources such as the radio spectrum and the numbering
system. And it can be a powerful tool for the protection of consumer
rights.
Regulators have numerous responsibilities and use various tools,
including:
• Licensing – granting of rights to telecommunication
networks and services and establishing their responsibilities
to contribute to national policy objectives, for example universal
service
• Management and licensing of the
radio spectrum – in
a way that maximises the value of this limited national resource
• Competition policy – creating an environment conducive
to competitive entry and managing mergers and acquisitions in the
telecommunications sector to head off anti-competitive practices
• Interconnection – to ensure that new entrants are
not handicapped by restrictive interconnection policies of incumbent
operators, such as inflated interconnection charges
• Numbering – developing a national numbering plan,
allocating numbers, and managing numbering resources, are as important
to voice and data communications as physical addresses are to the
postal system, and are key to ensuring easy access to networks
and services
• Equipment type approval – developing and monitoring
technical standards for equipment that connects to the networks
• Universal service/universal access – extending
networks and connections to households and communities, which
are handicapped by distance or poverty
• Telecommunications Development
Funds (TDF) – establish
and manage TDF to support investment in rural and under-served
areas and to promote community access solutions in those areas
• Price regulation – particularly for non-competitive
services provided by dominant providers, such as basic local telephony
• Quality of service – today’s tendency is to
focus on the quality of basic telephone service (response to repairs,
amount of time on waiting lists, directory enquiries, etc) rather
than on value-added services
• Consumer protection – defining consumer rights, drafting
appropriate legislation, education and communication programmes
Regulating the fast changing ICT environment to meet modern
objectives presents different challenges to those found in the
old monopolistic telecommunications environment. The main issues
to be addresses by today’s generation of policy makers
and regulators, such as universal service, tariffs, and prices,
are outlined in the following section
Another vision of regulation by Lawrence Lessig
We have the opportunity to preserve
the original principles of the Internet's architecture and the
chance to preserve the innovation that those principles made
possible. But that opportunity will require a commitment by us,
and by government, to defend what has worked and to keep the
Net open to change--a regulation to preserve innovation. The choice is not between regulation
and no regulation. The choice is whether we architect the network
to give power to network owners to regulate innovation, or whether
we architect it to remove that power to regulate. Rules that
entrench the right to innovate have done well for us so far.
They should not be repealed because of a confusion about "regulation."
Source: http://www.prospect.org/print/V11/10/lessig-l.html |
|
1 Patrick
Farajian, Key Lessons in Telecommunications Reform, Economic
Commission for West Asia, E/ESCWA/ICTD/2003/WG.1/CRP.3, 4 Feb
2003 (West Asia Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on
the Information Society)
|